The News, According to Facebook

The News, According to Facebook

To get a sense of just what my world would look like without any other social media influences, I decided to do an experiment: For one day, I could only get my news from Facebook. (This is also a good time to remind everyone that Facebook groups are still an effective way to reach your audience.) As hard as the news can be to digest, however, I have found myself missing some of the timely, tougher stories that Facebook has deemed “less friendly.” I do follow a fair amount of publishers, such as the New York Times, the Washington Post, Vice, and the Guardian. Going back to the bubble effect: Most of my Facebook friends still share my political and social beliefs, so I usually agreed with their comments, but it did take pages of scrolling until I found a post without any personal biases attached. After a few more dog photos, event announcements, and advertisements, I came across my first post from an actual publisher. Vice’s content is often some of the most interesting and entertaining on my feed, and this effective video was no exception. During my experiment, I noticed that most of the publishers I follow—aside from The Guardian—were more likely to post videos than text articles. Even as I scrolled through Facebook hoping to come across news stories, I found myself more likely to stick with videos than to click on an article if the excerpt didn’t immediately grab me. (I suppose it also depends what you classify as “news.” Do I think hurricane updates count more than videos about face masks? Despite the biases of its algorithm that edges out certain publishers, I still think of Facebook as a place to find out what’s going on in the world.

Facebook Messenger: The Complete Guide for Business
Why Your Facebook Videos Need to Be Different From What You Put on YouTube
How to Use Facebook Lead Ads to Grow Your Business

According to a 2017 study by the Pew Research Group, 45 percent of American adults get their news from Facebook. If you zoom out, 67 percent get their news from social media in general. If you kept up with the news at all over the last two years, you know that’s led to problems.

Facebook noticeably updated its algorithm earlier this year to prioritize content from friends and family over publishers. For the millions of Americans who rely on the social network as their source of worldly information, this inevitably means they’re already going to agree with a lot of what they’re seeing online. Facebook has already come under fire for perpetuating the spread of fake news, a problem the algorithm changes were supposed to fix. Instead, it’s ensured that users can stay safely in their existing filter bubbles.

To get a sense of just what my world would look like without any other social media influences, I decided to do an experiment: For one day, I could only get my news from Facebook.

A bubble unpopped

As a social media editor, this wasn’t the easiest task. Fortunately, we have tools like Buffer and Tweetdeck, so I can take care of my job without needing to see everything coming across Twitter, Snapchat, Reddit, and the like.

On Facebook, my feed is typically dominated by dogs. I follow groups like Dogspotting and Cool Dog Group because with so much insanity floating around the world on a daily basis, it does feel comforting when 80 percent of my newsfeed consists of animal photos and videos. (This is also a good time to remind everyone that Facebook groups are still an effective way to reach your audience.) As hard as the news can be to digest, however, I have found myself missing some of the timely, tougher stories that Facebook has deemed “less friendly.”

I do follow a fair amount of publishers, such as the New York Times, the Washington Post, Vice, and the Guardian. But as expected, I had to scroll through all of the friend statuses, shared photos, and requests for recommendations before I came across a single news article. Even then, it was a New York Times clip my father had shared about the effect of the recession and housing crisis on the middle class—not a post from the Times directly. So before I could even register the title of the piece, I saw his commentary about it, which I happened to agree with. The bubble remained un-popped.

I embarked on this quest after the New York primary elections and in the aftermath of Hurricane Florence, so after this link, I did start to see a fair amount of posts from my friends…

COMMENTS

WORDPRESS: 0
DISQUS: 0